Hello
everyone:
Today, I´m
talking about the exposition’ video Mark Pagel.
I´m agree with them, but only punctual points. For example I agree in the idea that the
language is a powerful army and involved a social learning based in the
imitation. However I´m disagree in the
point that the animals would be lower that human. In first place, Mr. Pagel be a speciesist,
obviously he is a science men, for this reason he believe that in the power of
natural selection like a benefit in
favor of the human. But, nobody today know about the exactly
origin the language and the point in the history evolution that the human way
separate that the chimpanzee. For this
reason I believe that Pagel is wrong, because he lack of background that affirm
this point. All that him say is a suppose.
Moreover he doesn’t show the investigation to support his affirmations.
In relation
to my language I think so that the Spanish, like other language, is important
for the identity formation while his operate like a way of expression, because
we could communicate a lot of ideas that the mind allow; although the
imagination is infinite. This processes
his called view of the world. Thanks to
this imaginary we build our culture. The culture don’t consist in the materials
or the hand axes that explain Pagel, it is in each one of the persons.
Isa.
"obviously he is a science men" XD hahaha He love you :'( don't treat to him this form!
ReplyDeleteThe video stink out to Darwin xD
You point of view is a good option to debate with Pagel and a lot of other people.
ReplyDeleteYes me too, I only found reason in a few of things
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting you say he has no research to support his ideas...I wonder if he would agree
ReplyDeleteI agree, language is important for the identity formation :)
ReplyDeleteI think that not only pans could develop "intelligence" and "concience"; cats, dolphins, dogs, lions, bees and more animals could try to destroy us, in order to rule this world...
ReplyDeleteI agree he is very speciesist and it is strange that he doesn`t consider the genetic evolution, bieng a biologist.
ReplyDeleteGood post Isabella. you also have made a good point in the sense he should show more concrete evidence.
ReplyDelete